Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM 70-28mm

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM 70-28mm

Canon
58 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Canon
69
Sigma
100
Budget
Canon
70
Sigma
99
Macro
Canon
50
Sigma
96
Travel
Canon
54
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Canon
56
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Canon
57
Sigma
87
Portrait
Canon
45
Sigma
85
Professional
Canon
61
Sigma
84
Street
Canon
54
Sigma
80

Specifications

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM 70-28mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm300 mm
Elements1920
Groups1314
Aspherical Elements14★
ED Elements35★
Coatingfluorine coatingwater- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/23.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight1.43 kg0.61 kg★
Filter Thread95 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★HLA
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification0.18x1:2★

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM 70-28mm

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (78th percentile)
  • Below average build (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports