Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox
67 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
86 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Viltrox
62
Panasonic
99
Budget
Viltrox
65
Panasonic
91
Landscape
Viltrox
55
Panasonic
86
Travel
Viltrox
55
Panasonic
86
Video Cinema
Viltrox
55
Panasonic
86
Street
Viltrox
73
Panasonic
80
Professional
Viltrox
54
Panasonic
80
Portrait
Viltrox
59
Panasonic
77
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
60
Panasonic
77

Specifications

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mmPanasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min56 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm200 mm
Elements1117
Groups913
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements44
CoatingHD nano-coatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/1.74-7.1
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony EL-Mount
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.17 kg★0.41 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance550 mm140 mm★
Max Magnification1:9.09★0.5x

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong optical (73rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports