Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II 24mm

Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II 24mm

Canon
32 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Canon
49
Sigma
100
Landscape
Canon
42
Sigma
100
Budget
Canon
27
Sigma
99
Travel
Canon
29
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Canon
31
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Canon
28
Sigma
87
Portrait
Canon
28
Sigma
85
Professional
Canon
42
Sigma
84
Street
Canon
30
Sigma
80

Specifications

Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II 24mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typetilt-shiftzoom
Focal Length Min24 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max24 mm300 mm
Elements1620
Groups1114
Aspherical Elements14★
ED Elements45★
CoatingSWCwater- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/3.53.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades89★
Build
MountCanon EFSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.78 kg0.61 kg★
Filter Thread82 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyHLA
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance210 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification0.34x1:2★

Pros & Cons

Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II 24mm

  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports