Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD 35mm
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
What Buyers Say
Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD 35mm
The Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its exceptional sharpness, bright aperture, and beautiful bokeh. Users praise its optical performance, often preferring it over native Nikon and Canon alternatives. A few concerns about compatibility with mirrorless adapters and minor chromatic aberration are noted, but the overall sentiment is highly favorable.
Pros
- Exceptional sharpness
- Bright f/1.4 aperture
- Beautiful bokeh
- Excellent build quality
- Great value for money
Cons
- Bulky with mirrorless adapter
- Heavy for mirrorless use
- Minor chromatic aberration wide open
- Compatibility issues with FTZ adapter
- No image stabilization
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM lens is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and robust build quality. Many users consider it a workhorse for sports, portraits, and low-light photography, though the lack of image stabilization is a notable drawback for some. A significant number of reviews highlight the lens's weight and the potential for focus inconsistencies, particularly with moving subjects. Concerns about Canon's support for older models and the tripod collar design also appear in negative feedback.
Pros
- Exceptional sharpness and image quality
- Fast and silent autofocus (USM)
- Excellent for low-light photography
- Versatile for sports and portraits
- Robust build quality
Cons
- No image stabilization
- Heavy and bulky
- Tripod collar design issues
- Inconsistent autofocus with moving subjects
- Canon no longer supports repairs
Scores
Specifications
| Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD 35mm | Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 70 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 14 | 17 |
| Groups | 10 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | 2 |
| ED Elements | 4 | 5★ |
| Coating | Fluorine Coating | Air Sphere Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.4 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Canon EF |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.81 kg★ | 1.07 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | USD | USM★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 3.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm★ | 700 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5★ | 0.3x |
Pros & Cons
Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD 35mm
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong macro (70th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
- Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong stabilization (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
Pricing
Verdict
Both products are closely matched - Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD 35mm wins 4 specs while Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM wins 4.
