Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm

Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm

Rokinon
35 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm

82 out of 100 high confidence 31 reviews

The Rokinon 16mm f/2.0 manual focus lens is a favorite among astrophotographers and landscape shooters on a budget, delivering sharp images and excellent light-gathering ability for its price. Users consistently praise its value and image quality, though several note that achieving precise focus can be tricky without autofocus or focus confirmation. Minor build concerns like a loose lens mount and cheap hood are mentioned, but overall it's highly recommended for its intended use.

Pros
  • Excellent image sharpness
  • Great value for the price
  • Fast f/2.0 aperture
  • Good for astrophotography
  • Lightweight build
Cons
  • Manual focus only
  • Difficult precise focusing
  • Focus confirmation not working
  • Loose lens mount
  • Cheap lens hood
👍 Image quality 14
👍 Value for money 8
👍 Astrophotography performance 10
👎 Manual focus difficulty 7
🤔 Build quality 5
👎 Lens mount looseness 2

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Budget
Rokinon
28
Tamron
97
Macro
Rokinon
57
Tamron
92
Landscape
Rokinon
33
Tamron
87
Wildlife Sports
Rokinon
20
Tamron
85
Professional
Rokinon
28
Tamron
85
Street
Rokinon
28
Tamron
83
Portrait
Rokinon
26
Tamron
82
Video Cinema
Rokinon
24
Tamron
82
Travel
Rokinon
23
Tamron
81

Specifications

Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max16 mm300 mm
Elements1320
Groups1113
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements12★
CoatingUMCfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperturef/24-7.1
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades89★
Build
MountPentax KSony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.58 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance200 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:3.8★

Pros & Cons

Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm

  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong optical (79th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports