Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma
96 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Viltrox
68 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

95 out of 100 high confidence 36 reviews

The Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC DN Art lens is overwhelmingly praised for its exceptional image quality, fast constant aperture, and compact internal zoom design. Users highlight its sharpness, lightweight build, and excellent autofocus performance, especially on crop-sensor mirrorless cameras like the Canon R7 and Fujifilm bodies. A few questions about compatibility with specific cameras and features like weather sealing and aperture ring are noted, but the overall sentiment is extremely positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional image quality
  • Fast constant f/1.8 aperture
  • Compact internal zoom design
  • Lightweight build
  • Sharp and bright photos
Cons
  • No weather sealing mentioned
  • No manual aperture ring on some mounts
  • Compatibility questions with full-frame cameras
  • Expensive for some buyers
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Aperture 7
👍 Build quality 6
👍 Autofocus 4
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Compatibility 12

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 23 reviews

The Viltrox 56mm f/1.7 is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, lightweight design, and outstanding value for money. Users consistently highlight its impressive image quality, with sharp details and pleasing bokeh, often comparing it favorably to much more expensive lenses. While the autofocus is generally reliable for portraits and stills, some users note it can be noisy and not as fast as native Fuji lenses. A few isolated concerns about dust ingress and the plastic build have been mentioned, but overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Excellent value for money
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Good low-light performance
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus (some users)
  • Autofocus slower than native lenses
  • Plastic build
  • Dust ingress reported
  • No physical aperture ring
👍 Image quality 18
👍 Value for money 15
🤔 Build quality 12
🤔 Autofocus performance 11
👍 Size and weight 10
👍 Bokeh 7

Scores

Portrait
Sigma
93
Viltrox
64
Video Cinema
Sigma
89
Viltrox
62
Professional
Sigma
89
Viltrox
63
Budget
Sigma
87
Viltrox
61
Macro
Sigma
82
Viltrox
60
Travel
Sigma
81
Viltrox
74
Street
Sigma
79
Viltrox
73
Landscape
Sigma
79
Viltrox
66
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
68
Viltrox
61

Specifications

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DCViltrox AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm56 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm56 mm
Elements1711
Groups119
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements44
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coatingmulti-layer coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.8f/16
Min Aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.54 kg0.19 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHLA (High-response Linear Actuator)STM★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm★550 mm
Max Magnification1:4.81:9.09

Pros & Cons

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Strong optical (72nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm is ¥131,067 cheaper (4.9x less).

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC0.001score per dollar
vs
Viltrox AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm0.002score per dollar

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm offers 2.0x better value for money

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 Z 56mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Scores 96 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider