Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon
80 Overall Score
vs
Sony SEL057FEC 16mm

Sony SEL057FEC 16mm

Sony
31 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Canon
89
Sony
19
Professional
Canon
80
Sony
21
Budget
Canon
80
Sony
28
Wildlife Sports
Canon
79
Sony
24
Video Cinema
Canon
75
Sony
19
Travel
Canon
73
Sony
22
Macro
Canon
65
Sony
49
Street
Canon
64
Sony
25
Portrait
Canon
54
Sony
19

Specifications

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USMSony SEL057FEC 16mm
Optics
Typezoomfisheye
Focal Length Min15 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm16 mm
Elements16
Groups12
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingAir-Sphere coating, Fluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.84 kg0.42 kg
Filter Thread82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeNano USM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm28 mm
Max Magnification0.21x

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Sony SEL057FEC 16mm

  • Strong macro (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Scores 80 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports