Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
89 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Art 35S963 60mm

Sigma Art 35S963 60mm

Sigma
66 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Canon
91
Sigma
55
Landscape
Canon
83
Sigma
39
Video Cinema
Canon
83
Sigma
69
Professional
Canon
82
Sigma
66
Travel
Canon
82
Sigma
42
Budget
Canon
80
Sigma
65
Wildlife Sports
Canon
79
Sigma
57
Portrait
Canon
53
Sigma
77
Street
Canon
68
Sigma
71

Specifications

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMSigma Art 35S963 60mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm60 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm60 mm
Elements15
Groups12
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements2
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)SLD
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountCanon RFMicro Four Thirds
Formatfull-framemicro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed
Weight0.49 kg0.42 kg
Filter Thread67 mm46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMLinear motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance239 mm500 mm
Max Magnification1:4.21:7.2

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Sigma Art 35S963 60mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (70th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sigma Art 35S963 60mm Better at:

StreetPortrait