Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Sports 150-600mm 5-6.3 DG OS HSM

Sigma Sports 150-600mm 5-6.3 DG OS HSM

Sigma
45 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Sigma
47
Macro
Nikon
88
Sigma
35
Budget
Nikon
85
Sigma
53
Street
Nikon
84
Sigma
45
Portrait
Nikon
84
Sigma
49
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Sigma
47
Landscape
Nikon
79
Sigma
51
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Sigma
49
Travel
Nikon
70
Sigma
46

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Sports 150-600mm 5-6.3 DG OS HSM
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm150 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm600 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements35★
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/6.3
Min Aperturef/2.8f/5
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZNikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★2.86 kg
Filter Thread67 mm105 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★Hyper Sonic Motor
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Sports 150-600mm 5-6.3 DG OS HSM

  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (69th percentile)
  • Strong optical (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports