Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm
82 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
91
Professional
Nikon
89
Fujifilm
84
Macro
Nikon
88
Fujifilm
71
Budget
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
72
Portrait
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
82
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Fujifilm
79
Landscape
Nikon
79
Fujifilm
57
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Fujifilm
69
Travel
Nikon
70
Fujifilm
66

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements139
Groups116
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements3★2
CoatingMulti-CoatedNano-GI coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg0.13 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm43 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motorstepping motor
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★350 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:7

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm Better at:

Street