Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

Canon
76 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

82 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its sharpness, color reproduction, and value for money, especially on a budget. Users praise its compact size, metal mount, and low-light performance, though some note the autofocus is noisy and slow compared to USM lenses. A few isolated complaints mention build quality feeling plasticky or the lens not working at all, but the majority find it a reliable workhorse for both crop sensor and full-frame cameras.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness and color
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Metal mount for durability
  • Great low-light performance
  • Good value for budget buyers
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus
  • Slow autofocus compared to USM
  • Plasticky build quality
  • Lacks image stabilization
  • Large manual focus ring angle
👍 Sharpness 5
🤔 Build quality 4
👎 Autofocus noise 4
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Low light performance 3
👍 Compatibility 2

Scores

Macro
Nikon
83
Canon
95
Portrait
Nikon
89
Canon
75
Professional
Nikon
88
Canon
74
Budget
Nikon
83
Canon
66
Street
Nikon
83
Canon
82
Video Cinema
Nikon
80
Canon
78
Landscape
Nikon
78
Canon
55
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
72
Canon
64
Travel
Nikon
70
Canon
60

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mmCanon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm28 mm
Elements1311
Groups118
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements3★1
CoatingMulti-CoatedCanon Super Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades9★5
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF-M
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg0.12 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorSTM★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm94 mm★
Max Magnification1:5.261.2x★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

BudgetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm Better at:

Macro

Also Consider