Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z 105mm

Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z 105mm

Canon
76 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Canon
74
Macro
Nikon
88
Canon
67
Budget
Nikon
85
Canon
80
Street
Nikon
84
Canon
62
Portrait
Nikon
84
Canon
53
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Canon
81
Landscape
Nikon
79
Canon
78
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Canon
72
Travel
Nikon
70
Canon
69

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z 105mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm105 mm
Elements1323
Groups1118
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements34★
CoatingMulti-CoatedFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades911★
Build
MountNikon ZCanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★1.31 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorNano USM★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—5.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★450 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.29x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z 105mm

  • Strong optical (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average build (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (33rd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitProfessional