Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical

Sigma
62 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Sigma
53
Macro
Nikon
88
Sigma
86
Budget
Nikon
85
Sigma
61
Street
Nikon
84
Sigma
62
Portrait
Nikon
84
Sigma
65
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Sigma
52
Landscape
Nikon
79
Sigma
51
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Sigma
47
Travel
Nikon
70
Sigma
51

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm200 mm
Elements1316
Groups1114
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-CoatedMulti-layer lens coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg0.40 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★—
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm35 mm★
Max Magnification1:5.261:3.8

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical

  • Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong optical (76th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports