Rokinon AF IO75AF-FX 75mm

Rokinon AF IO75AF-FX 75mm

Rokinon
47 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm

Canon
79 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Rokinon
50
Canon
88
Budget
Rokinon
42
Canon
80
Professional
Rokinon
63
Canon
79
Wildlife Sports
Rokinon
64
Canon
78
Video Cinema
Rokinon
57
Canon
74
Travel
Rokinon
53
Canon
72
Street
Rokinon
60
Canon
64
Macro
Rokinon
50
Canon
64
Portrait
Rokinon
42
Canon
55

Specifications

Rokinon AF IO75AF-FX 75mmCanon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min75 mm15 mm
Focal Length Max75 mm35 mm
Elements1016
Groups912
Aspherical Elements23
ED Elements32
CoatingUltra Multi-CoatingAir-Sphere coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/22
Min Aperturef/1.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm XCanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.84 kg
Filter Thread62 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear STMNano USM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance690 mm280 mm
Max Magnification1:7.70.21x

Pros & Cons

Rokinon AF IO75AF-FX 75mm

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (74th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (26th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (26th percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm

Scores 79 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports