Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

Tamron
65 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Nikon
97
Tamron
60
Budget
Nikon
94
Tamron
72
Travel
Nikon
85
Tamron
74
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Tamron
57
Portrait
Nikon
81
Tamron
46
Landscape
Nikon
80
Tamron
69
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
76
Tamron
56
Macro
Nikon
70
Tamron
75
Professional
Nikon
74
Tamron
55

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VRTamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm200 mm
Elements917
Groups713
Aspherical Elements4★3
ED Elements12★
CoatingSuper Integrated CoatingInternal Surface coatings, multiple-layered coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/18
Min Aperture3.5-6.33.5-6.3
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountNikon ZNikon F
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✗—
Weight0.14 kg★0.40 kg
Filter Thread46 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★Auto Focus
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance200 mm★498 mm
Max Magnification0.2x1:3.7★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (33rd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm Better at:

Macro