Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 158-38mm

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 158-38mm

Canon
65 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Canon
50
Nikon
95
Portrait
Canon
37
Nikon
89
Street
Canon
59
Nikon
86
Budget
Canon
58
Nikon
86
Macro
Canon
47
Nikon
85
Landscape
Canon
42
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Canon
50
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Canon
50
Nikon
78
Travel
Canon
54
Nikon
75

Specifications

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 158-38mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min24 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max24 mm28 mm
Elements613
Groups511
Aspherical Elements13
ED Elements3
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountCanon EF-SNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.13 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance160 mm190 mm
Max Magnification0.27x1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM 158-38mm

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports