Tamron Di III A075 25-200mm

Tamron Di III A075 25-200mm

Tamron
78 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm

Canon
79 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Tamron
59
Canon
88
Budget
Tamron
81
Canon
80
Portrait
Tamron
81
Canon
55
Professional
Tamron
60
Canon
79
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
54
Canon
78
Macro
Tamron
75
Canon
64
Video Cinema
Tamron
60
Canon
74
Travel
Tamron
64
Canon
72
Street
Tamron
68
Canon
64

Specifications

Tamron Di III A075 25-200mmCanon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min25 mm15 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm35 mm
Elements1816
Groups1412
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingAir-Sphere coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperture2.8-5.6f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.59 kg0.84 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXDNano USM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance160 mm280 mm
Max Magnification1:1.90.21x

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III A075 25-200mm

  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong macro (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (26th percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm

Scores 79 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Tamron Di III A075 25-200mm Better at:

MacroStreetPortrait

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM 15-35mm Better at:

TravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports