Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm

Fujifilm
76 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
87 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm

72 out of 100 medium confidence 14 reviews

The Fuji XF 24mm f/2.8 lens is widely praised for its compact size, light weight, and excellent image quality, especially for travel and outdoor photography. Users highlight its sharpness, micro contrast, and weather sealing, though some note softness at wide apertures and mediocre indoor performance. A few reviewers find it less impressive compared to faster or wider alternatives, but overall it is considered a versatile and portable prime lens.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Excellent sharpness and micro contrast
  • Great for travel and outdoor photography
  • Weather-sealed build
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Soft at wide apertures
  • Mediocre indoor performance
  • Lacks manual focus switch
  • Bokeh not as good as f/1.4 version
  • Some find it less sharp than alternatives
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Portability 5
👍 Build quality 4
🤔 Sharpness 5
🤔 Aperture performance 4
👍 Autofocus 2

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

75 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

The Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm f/4-7.1 MACRO O.I.S. lens is widely praised for its compact size, versatile zoom range, and macro capability, making it an ideal travel companion. Users appreciate the optical stabilization and the convenience of not swapping lenses, though some note softness at extreme ends and a slow aperture. Overall, it's a solid all-in-one solution for outdoor and travel photography.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Versatile zoom range (28-200mm)
  • Macro capability
  • Effective optical stabilization
  • Convenient all-in-one travel lens
Cons
  • Soft at wide and telephoto ends
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Not ideal for low light without stabilization
  • Requires stopping down for sharpness
👍 Compactness 5
👍 Versatility 4
🤔 Image quality 4
👎 Aperture speed 4
👍 Stabilization 3
👍 Macro capability 2

Scores

Macro
Fujifilm
88
Panasonic
95
Budget
Fujifilm
74
Panasonic
90
Landscape
Fujifilm
76
Panasonic
90
Travel
Fujifilm
83
Panasonic
87
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
74
Panasonic
86
Portrait
Fujifilm
60
Panasonic
82
Professional
Fujifilm
77
Panasonic
81
Street
Fujifilm
76
Panasonic
80
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
70
Panasonic
77

Specifications

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mmPanasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max16 mm200 mm
Elements1017
Groups813
Aspherical Elements2★1
ED Elements—4★
CoatingSuper EBC multi-layer coatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm XL-Mount
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.15 kg★0.41 kg
Filter Thread49 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motor★Autofocus
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—6.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance16 mm★140 mm
Max Magnification1:7.7★0.5x

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm

  • Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Pricing

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm is ¥108,307 cheaper (2.3x less).

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 87 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider