OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm

OM System
74 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
OM System
69
Tamron
97
Macro
OM System
69
Tamron
92
Landscape
OM System
69
Tamron
87
Wildlife Sports
OM System
57
Tamron
85
Professional
OM System
61
Tamron
85
Street
OM System
62
Tamron
83
Video Cinema
OM System
53
Tamron
82
Portrait
OM System
56
Tamron
82
Travel
OM System
69
Tamron
81

Specifications

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min12 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm300 mm
Elements1620
Groups1113
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements—2★
CoatingZERO coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/6.3f/4
Min Aperture3.5-6.34-7.1
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsSony E
Formatmicro-four-thirdsfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.46 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAuto FocusVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance220 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:2.71:3.8

Pros & Cons

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports