OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED V335360BW000 200mm

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED V335360BW000 200mm

OM System
62 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
OM System
53
Nikon
95
Portrait
OM System
36
Nikon
89
Street
OM System
49
Nikon
86
Budget
OM System
55
Nikon
86
Macro
OM System
63
Nikon
85
Landscape
OM System
68
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
OM System
40
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
OM System
53
Nikon
78
Travel
OM System
67
Nikon
75

Specifications

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED V335360BW000 200mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min12 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm28 mm
Elements1613
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements3
CoatingZERO coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperture3.5-6.3f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsNikon Z
Formatmicro-four-thirdsfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.46 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance220 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:2.71:5.26

Pros & Cons

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED V335360BW000 200mm

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports