Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm

Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm

Laowa
73 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron
97 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm

82 out of 100 high confidence 31 reviews

The Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D lens is widely praised for its compact size, sharp image quality, and minimal distortion, making it a favorite for landscape, architecture, and real estate photography. Users appreciate its wide field of view and solid build, though some note vignetting at wide apertures and a few report sample variation or infinity focus issues. Overall, it offers excellent value for an ultra-wide manual lens, especially for APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Sharp image quality
  • Minimal distortion (Zero-D)
  • Wide field of view
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Vignetting at wide apertures
  • Infinity focus inconsistency
  • Sample variation (sharpness)
  • Manual focus only
  • High price for some
👍 Image quality 12
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Distortion 7
👎 Vignetting 5
🤔 Value for money 6
👎 Focus issues 4

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

85 out of 100 high confidence 62 reviews

The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD lens is widely praised for its sharpness, versatile zoom range, constant aperture, and effective stabilization, making it an excellent all-around lens for APS-C cameras. Users appreciate its solid build quality and value for money, though many note it is noticeably heavier and larger than typical kit lenses, which can feel unbalanced on smaller camera bodies. A few reviewers mention minor issues like chromatic aberration at the longer end and noise from the aperture blades at certain settings, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • sharp image quality across zoom range
  • constant f/2.8 aperture
  • effective image stabilization
  • fast and quiet autofocus
  • versatile 17-70mm focal range
Cons
  • heavy and large for APS-C body
  • chromatic aberration at 50-70mm
  • aperture blade noise above f/5.6
  • short zoom throw initially stiff
  • no aperture ring on Fuji version
👍 Image quality 27
👍 Build quality 15
🤔 Weight and size 18
👍 Value for money 14
👍 Stabilization 12
👍 Autofocus performance 11

Scores

Video Cinema
Laowa
66
Tamron
98
Budget
Laowa
64
Tamron
96
Macro
Laowa
82
Tamron
91
Professional
Laowa
75
Tamron
91
Portrait
Laowa
78
Tamron
90
Travel
Laowa
63
Tamron
87
Landscape
Laowa
60
Tamron
84
Street
Laowa
75
Tamron
78
Wildlife Sports
Laowa
49
Tamron
75

Specifications

Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mmTamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min9 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max9 mm70 mm
Elements1516
Groups1012
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements3★2
CoatingFrog Eye CoatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.21 kg★0.54 kg
Filter Thread49 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyRXD
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance120 mm★190 mm
Max Magnification1:7.71:4.8

Pros & Cons

Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm

  • Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm is ¥55,656 cheaper (1.6x less).

Laowa 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider