Nikon 20069

Nikon 20069

Nikon
58 Overall Score
vs
Sigma 36B965

Sigma 36B965

Sigma
35 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Nikon
67
Sigma
16
Professional
Nikon
66
Sigma
30
Portrait
Nikon
52
Sigma
60
Landscape
Nikon
55
Sigma
14
Video Cinema
Nikon
53
Sigma
36
Budget
Nikon
52
Sigma
40
Street
Nikon
52
Sigma
41
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
51
Sigma
27
Travel
Nikon
45
Sigma
15

Specifications

Nikon 20069Sigma 36B965
Optics
Typeprime
Focal Length Min28 mm45 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm45 mm
Elements14
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingNano Crystal and Super Integrated Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountNikon FSony E
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.64 kg4.13 kg
Filter Thread77 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm
Max Magnification1:5.9

Pros & Cons

Nikon 20069

  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (65th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Sigma 36B965

  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma 36B965 is ¥85,291 cheaper (1.6x less).

Verdict

Winner: Nikon 20069

Scores 58 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon 20069 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sigma 36B965 Better at:

Portrait

Also Consider