Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS

Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS

Sigma
68 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS

85 out of 100 high confidence 118 reviews

Reviewers consistently praise the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS Sports Lens for its stellar image sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent build quality, often calling it a fantastic value compared to pricier OEM alternatives. Many users highlight the internal zoom and solid magnesium construction as standout features. The most common and significant drawback is the lens's heavy weight, which can cause fatigue during extended handheld use. A few users also note a tight zoom ring initially and incompatibility with some filter systems.

Pros
  • Exceptional image sharpness
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Excellent build quality
  • Great value for the money
  • Internal zoom mechanism
Cons
  • Heavy weight
  • Non-removable tripod collar
  • Tight zoom ring initially
  • No front filter threads
  • Limited button customization
👍 Image quality 38
👍 Autofocus performance 32
👍 Build quality 28
👍 Value for money 24
👎 Weight 26
👍 Stabilization 12

Scores

Travel
Sony
95
Sigma
61
Budget
Sony
90
Sigma
68
Street
Sony
88
Sigma
51
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Sigma
71
Wildlife Sports
Sony
83
Sigma
64
Portrait
Sony
83
Sigma
51
Landscape
Sony
79
Sigma
72
Professional
Sony
77
Sigma
65
Macro
Sony
66
Sigma
74

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSSigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm200 mm
Elements920
Groups815
Aspherical Elements4★3
ED Elements110★
Coating—Super Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades711★
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg★1.34 kg
Filter Thread41 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusHSM
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops7.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★650 mm
Max Magnification0.215x1:5.2★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS

  • Strong optical (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong social proof (71st percentile)
  • Below average build (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is ¥152,318 cheaper (5.7x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS Better at:

Macro

Also Consider