Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

Canon RF EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

Canon
51 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Canon RF EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

78 out of 100 high confidence 193 reviews

The Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM is a lens that divides opinion. Many users adore its dreamy, characterful rendering, creamy bokeh, and beautiful color, especially for portraits and low-light work. However, a significant number report issues with slow and unreliable autofocus, softness wide open, and a high price tag that doesn't always match the optical performance. It's a lens that rewards skill and patience but can frustrate those seeking clinical sharpness and fast, consistent AF.

Pros
  • Beautiful creamy bokeh
  • Dreamy, characterful rendering
  • Excellent color and contrast
  • Solid build quality
  • Great for portraits and low light
Cons
  • Slow and unreliable autofocus
  • Soft wide open at f/1.2
  • Very expensive
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Noticeable chromatic aberration
👍 Image quality 35
👎 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Bokeh 25
👍 Build quality 20
👎 Value for money 18
🤔 Sharpness 22

Scores

Travel
Sony
98
Canon
42
Street
Sony
90
Canon
52
Budget
Sony
86
Canon
57
Video Cinema
Sony
84
Canon
54
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Canon
51
Portrait
Sony
83
Canon
52
Landscape
Sony
82
Canon
45
Professional
Sony
78
Canon
56
Macro
Sony
66
Canon
41

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSCanon RF EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm50 mm
Elements98
Groups86
Aspherical Elements4★1
ED Elements11
Coating—Super Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/1.2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades78★
Build
MountSony ECanon EF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg★0.95 kg
Filter Thread41 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusUSM★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★450 mm
Max Magnification0.215x★0.19x

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Canon RF EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is ¥157,897 cheaper (5.9x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Canon RF EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider