Sigma Art 33B965 30mm

Sigma Art 33B965 30mm

Sigma
72 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
87 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sigma
66
Canon
97
Video Cinema
Sigma
66
Canon
89
Portrait
Sigma
76
Canon
89
Street
Sigma
86
Canon
80
Travel
Sigma
53
Canon
76
Landscape
Sigma
47
Canon
72
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
61
Canon
72
Macro
Sigma
72
Canon
71
Professional
Sigma
64
Canon
70

Specifications

Sigma Art 33B965 30mmCanon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typestandardzoom
Focal Length Min30 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max30 mm135 mm
Elements—16
Groups—12
Aspherical Elements2★1
ED Elements2★1
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant—✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony ECanon EF-S
Formatmicro-four-thirdsAPS-C★
Weather Sealed—✗
Weight0.14 kg★0.52 kg
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motor★STM
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm★390 mm
Max Magnification1:8.1★0.28x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Art 33B965 30mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 87 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Sigma Art 33B965 30mm Better at:

Street

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Better at:

BudgetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports