Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm

Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm

Zeiss
35 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Viltrox
86 Overall Score

Scores

Portrait
Zeiss
35
Viltrox
100
Video Cinema
Zeiss
32
Viltrox
94
Professional
Zeiss
36
Viltrox
88
Budget
Zeiss
24
Viltrox
83
Street
Zeiss
30
Viltrox
82
Wildlife Sports
Zeiss
20
Viltrox
71
Landscape
Zeiss
32
Viltrox
69
Macro
Zeiss
46
Viltrox
66
Travel
Zeiss
17
Viltrox
55

Specifications

Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mmViltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min100 mm27 mm
Focal Length Max100 mm27 mm
Elements1415
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements9★2
CoatingZEISS T* anti-reflective coatingHD Nano multilayer coating with water-resistant and antifouling coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/1.2
Min Aperturef/1.4f/1.2
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades—11★
Build
MountNikon FSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight1.34 kg0.56 kg★
Filter Thread86 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeManual FocusSTM★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance1.00 m280 mm★
Max Magnification1:8.6★0.15x

Pros & Cons

Zeiss Otus 100mm f/1.4 ZF.2 100mm

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Below average build (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

  • Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports