Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike
43 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
85 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Meike
40
Canon
97
Portrait
Meike
40
Canon
89
Video Cinema
Meike
32
Canon
89
Street
Meike
39
Canon
80
Travel
Meike
31
Canon
76
Wildlife Sports
Meike
25
Canon
72
Landscape
Meike
32
Canon
72
Professional
Meike
32
Canon
70
Macro
Meike
48
Canon
69

Specifications

Meike 35095 m43 35mmCanon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm135 mm
Elements1016
Groups712
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements—1★
CoatingMulti-layer nano coatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/0.953.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades13★7
Build
MountSony ECanon EF-S
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed—✗
Weight0.38 kg★0.52 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlySTM★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm390 mm
Max Magnification—0.28x★

Pros & Cons

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

  • Strong build (66th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports