Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike
43 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Meike
40
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Meike
25
Nikon
94
Travel
Meike
31
Nikon
92
Landscape
Meike
32
Nikon
88
Professional
Meike
32
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Meike
32
Nikon
82
Street
Meike
39
Nikon
81
Portrait
Meike
40
Nikon
78
Macro
Meike
48
Nikon
71

Specifications

Meike 35095 m43 35mmNikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm200 mm
Elements1019
Groups715
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements—1★
CoatingMulti-layer nano coatingARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/0.954-6.3
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades13★7
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.38 kg★0.57 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlystepping motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification—0.28x★

Pros & Cons

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

  • Strong build (66th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports