Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN

Sigma
87 Overall Score
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Sigma
70
Sony
94
Professional
Sigma
91
Sony
77
Budget
Sigma
83
Sony
91
Street
Sigma
85
Sony
90
Macro
Sigma
85
Sony
68
Video Cinema
Sigma
83
Sony
85
Portrait
Sigma
84
Sony
77
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
74
Sony
84
Landscape
Sigma
73
Sony
79

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DNSony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm50 mm
Elements169
Groups118
Aspherical Elements44
ED Elements5★1
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg0.11 kg★
Filter Thread72 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorAutofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm250 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55★0.215x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Verdict

═ Tie

Both products are closely matched - Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN wins 5 specs while Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS wins 3.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN Better at:

MacroPortraitProfessional

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelLandscapeWildlife Sports