Canon L Advanced Two Lens Kit 17-40mm

Canon L Advanced Two Lens Kit 17-40mm

Canon
89 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
73 Overall Score

Scores

Portrait
Canon
92
Sigma
73
Professional
Canon
89
Sigma
64
Street
Canon
87
Sigma
62
Budget
Canon
86
Sigma
69
Video Cinema
Canon
83
Sigma
64
Macro
Canon
83
Sigma
69
Travel
Canon
76
Sigma
69
Wildlife Sports
Canon
75
Sigma
65
Landscape
Canon
74
Sigma
68

Specifications

Canon L Advanced Two Lens Kit 17-40mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min17 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm300 mm
Elements12—
Groups9—
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements1★—
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingwater- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.4f/3.5
Min Aperturef/43.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountCanon EFCanon RF
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.50 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★HLA (High-response Linear Actuator)
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance40 mm★250 mm
Max Magnification0.24x1:2★

Pros & Cons

Canon L Advanced Two Lens Kit 17-40mm

  • Strong aperture (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong macro (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average social proof (28th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon L Advanced Two Lens Kit 17-40mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Canon L Advanced Two Lens Kit 17-40mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports