Canon EF-S17-55IS

Canon EF-S17-55IS

Canon
80 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron
97 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon EF-S17-55IS

78 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews

The Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM lens is highly praised for its sharpness, fast focusing, and constant f/2.8 aperture, making it a versatile choice for low-light and everyday photography on crop-sensor cameras. Users appreciate its optical quality, often comparing it to Canon's L-series lenses, though some note the lack of weather sealing as a drawback, with a few reporting dust or sand issues. Overall, it is considered a reliable workhorse lens, especially for indoor and event photography.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Constant f/2.8 aperture
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Versatile zoom range
Cons
  • No weather sealing
  • Dust and sand ingress issues
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Large size compared to mirrorless lenses
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Autofocus performance 4
👍 Aperture and low light 5
🤔 Build quality and sealing 4
🤔 Compatibility 5
👍 Versatility 4

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

85 out of 100 high confidence 62 reviews

The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD lens is widely praised for its sharpness, versatile zoom range, constant aperture, and effective stabilization, making it an excellent all-around lens for APS-C cameras. Users appreciate its solid build quality and value for money, though many note it is noticeably heavier and larger than typical kit lenses, which can feel unbalanced on smaller camera bodies. A few reviewers mention minor issues like chromatic aberration at the longer end and noise from the aperture blades at certain settings, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • sharp image quality across zoom range
  • constant f/2.8 aperture
  • effective image stabilization
  • fast and quiet autofocus
  • versatile 17-70mm focal range
Cons
  • heavy and large for APS-C body
  • chromatic aberration at 50-70mm
  • aperture blade noise above f/5.6
  • short zoom throw initially stiff
  • no aperture ring on Fuji version
👍 Image quality 27
👍 Build quality 15
🤔 Weight and size 18
👍 Value for money 14
👍 Stabilization 12
👍 Autofocus performance 11

Scores

Video Cinema
Canon
91
Tamron
98
Budget
Canon
89
Tamron
96
Macro
Canon
68
Tamron
91
Professional
Canon
82
Tamron
91
Portrait
Canon
90
Tamron
90
Travel
Canon
62
Tamron
87
Landscape
Canon
68
Tamron
84
Street
Canon
80
Tamron
78
Wildlife Sports
Canon
72
Tamron
75

Specifications

Canon EF-S17-55ISTamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max55 mm70 mm
Elements1916
Groups1212
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements22
CoatingSuper SpectraFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EF-SSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.65 kg0.54 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★RXD
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops3 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.17x1:4.8★

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S17-55IS

  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Canon EF-S17-55IS

No current pricing available

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Scores 97 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S17-55IS Better at:

Street

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider