OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4 IS PRO
OM System
69 Overall Score
vs
Laowa Zero-D 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm
Laowa
72 Overall Score
Scores
Landscape
Macro
Street
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Travel
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4 IS PRO | Laowa Zero-D 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 12 mm | 9 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 100 mm | 9 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 15 |
| Groups | 11 | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | 2 |
| ED Elements | 5★ | 3 |
| Coating | Z Coating Nano | Frog Eye Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Canon RF |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.56 kg | 0.21 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 49 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 150 mm | 120 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.3x | 1:7.7★ |
Pros & Cons
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4 IS PRO
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong build (67th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
Laowa Zero-D 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm
- Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4 IS PRO
Laowa Zero-D 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: Laowa Zero-D 9mm f/2.8 Zero-D 9mm
Scores 72 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.
