Tamron Di III 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M 1:2 35mm

Tamron Di III 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M 1:2 35mm

Tamron
75 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Tamron
90
Nikon
88
Professional
Tamron
81
Nikon
89
Street
Tamron
87
Nikon
84
Budget
Tamron
74
Nikon
85
Portrait
Tamron
77
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Tamron
76
Nikon
82
Landscape
Tamron
57
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
67
Nikon
73
Travel
Tamron
66
Nikon
70

Specifications

Tamron Di III 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M 1:2 35mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm28 mm
Elements913
Groups811
Aspherical Elements13★
ED Elements13★
CoatingFluorine CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.21 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeOSD stepping motorStepping Motor
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance150 mm★190 mm
Max Magnification1:21:5.26

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M 1:2 35mm

  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong macro (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M 1:2 35mm Better at:

MacroStreet

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

BudgetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports