HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E

HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E

HK Meike
42 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
HK Meike
46
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
HK Meike
35
Nikon
94
Travel
HK Meike
36
Nikon
92
Landscape
HK Meike
24
Nikon
88
Professional
HK Meike
35
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
HK Meike
40
Nikon
82
Street
HK Meike
55
Nikon
81
Portrait
HK Meike
51
Nikon
78
Macro
HK Meike
21
Nikon
74

Specifications

HK Meike 35mm F2.0 ENikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min35 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm200 mm
Elements—19
Groups—15
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements—1★
Coating—ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/4
Min Aperturef/24-6.3
Constant—✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
Mount—Nikon Z
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.29 kg★0.57 kg
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—stepping motor★
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—500 mm★
Max Magnification—0.28x★

Pros & Cons

HK Meike 35mm F2.0 E

  • Strong build (70th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports