Viltrox S 56mm T1.5 56mm

Viltrox S 56mm T1.5 56mm

Viltrox
36 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Viltrox
33
Nikon
89
Budget
Viltrox
27
Nikon
85
Street
Viltrox
33
Nikon
84
Macro
Viltrox
47
Nikon
84
Portrait
Viltrox
39
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Viltrox
40
Nikon
82
Landscape
Viltrox
32
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
28
Nikon
73
Travel
Viltrox
24
Nikon
70

Specifications

Viltrox S 56mm T1.5 56mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typestandardzoom
Focal Length Min56 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max56 mm28 mm
Elements1013
Groups911
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements13★
Coatingnano multi-layer coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.5f/2.8
Constant—✓★
Diaphragm Blades14★9
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.54 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyStepping Motor★
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance630 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Viltrox S 56mm T1.5 56mm

  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports