Kingston FURY Beast KF552C40BWAK2-64 White 2023
Kingston
22 Overall Score
vs
Thunderobot Radiant 16" Radiant 16S Black
Thunderobot
64 Overall Score
Scores
Gaming
Creator
Developer
Entertainment
Student
Business
Ai Llm
Compact
Specifications
| Kingston FURY Beast KF552C40BWAK2-64 | Thunderobot Radiant 16" Radiant 16S | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 6 | 16★ |
| Frequency | 3.2 GHz★ | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 64 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | — | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | No data | |
| Type | — | discrete |
| VRAM | — | 8 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | — | GDDR7 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 64 GB★ | 32 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Storage 1 | — | 1 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | — | NVMe SSD★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | — | 16" |
| Refresh Rate | — | 300 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 500 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | full DCI-P3 color reproduction |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | — | 2★ |
| USB Ports | — | 3★ |
| HDMI | — | HDMI |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6★ |
| Ethernet | — | Ethernet |
| Physical | ||
| OS | — | Windows 11 Home |
Pros & Cons
Kingston FURY Beast KF552C40BWAK2-64 White 2023
- Strong ram (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average storage (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average reliability (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average port selection (4th percentile)4th %ile
Thunderobot Radiant 16" Radiant 16S Black
- Strong cpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong gpu (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong screen (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong ram (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average reliability (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average portability (19th percentile)19th %ile
Pricing
Verdict
Winner: Thunderobot Radiant 16" Radiant 16S
Scores 64 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 14 of 24 specs.
