JBL Live JBLLIVE675NCBLKAM
JBL
36 Overall Score
vs
TOZO HT2
TOZO
82 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Music
Commute
Studio
Work
Calls
Specifications
| JBL Live JBLLIVE675NCBLKAM | TOZO HT2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | — | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.42 kg | 0.22 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | — | Leather |
| Headband | — | Leather |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 45 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | TOZO Hybrid Active Noise Cancelling Headphones, Wireless Over Ear Bluetooth Headset, 60H Playtime, Hi-Res Audio Custom EQ via App Deep Bass Comfort Fit Ear Cups, for Home Office Travel |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Cable Length | — | 1.8300000429153442 m |
| Range | — | 30 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 65 hrs★ | 60 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | speed-charge function | higher voltages and charging interfaces |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 3★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Alexa, Hey Google | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | — |
| App | — | TOZO APP |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
Pros & Cons
JBL Live JBLLIVE675NCBLKAM
- Strong battery (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong anc (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong connectivity (77th percentile)
- Strong sound (66th percentile)
- Below average comfort (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average mic (18th percentile)18th %ile
TOZO HT2
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong battery (91st percentile)91st %ile
Verdict
Winner: TOZO HT2
Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 36 specs.