TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Overall Score
vs
Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL

Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL

Audio-Technica
31 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
TOZO
79
Audio-Technica
41
Gaming
TOZO
79
Audio-Technica
16
Travel
TOZO
78
Audio-Technica
19
Fitness
TOZO
72
Audio-Technica
21
Calls
TOZO
70
Audio-Technica
12
Commute
TOZO
70
Audio-Technica
18
Music
TOZO
68
Audio-Technica
20

Specifications

TOZO Crystal PodsAudio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessear-tip
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg0.02 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω20 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Pros & Cons

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL

  • Strong comfort (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average mic (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average sound (30th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

Pricing

TOZO Crystal Pods

No current pricing available

Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL

Verdict

Winner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 22 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider