TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Overall Score
vs
SIAWAG BTW62H-Metal Gray

SIAWAG BTW62H-Metal Gray

SIAWAG
54 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
TOZO
81
SIAWAG
56
Gaming
TOZO
81
SIAWAG
42
Travel
TOZO
75
SIAWAG
54
Fitness
TOZO
74
SIAWAG
46
Commute
TOZO
70
SIAWAG
54
Music
TOZO
70
SIAWAG
51
Calls
TOZO
66
SIAWAG
42

Specifications

TOZO Crystal PodsSIAWAG BTW62H-Metal Gray
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless—
Ear TipsMedium—
Weight0.04 kg★—
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm10 mm
Drivers22
Freq Min20 Hz★—
Freq Max20 kHz★—
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB★—
Hi-Res Audio✓★—
CodecsLDAC—
SurroundStereo, Surround—
Noise Control
ANC✓✓
ANC Typehybridhybrid
Transparency✓★—
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth5.45.4
Multipoint✓★—
Range10 m★—
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs7.5 hrs★
Charge Time2 hrs★—
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play—
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs70 hrs★
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging✓✓
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count4★—
NC Mic✓★—
Features
Voice AssistantOther—
Touch Controls✓★—
AppTOZO App—
Gaming Mode✓★—
Bone Conduction✗—
Water ResistanceIPX5Waterproof

Pros & Cons

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong sound (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile

SIAWAG BTW62H-Metal Gray

  • Strong battery (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong anc (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong sound (78th percentile)
  • Strong build (73rd percentile)
  • Below average comfort (30th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 37 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness