AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-core Socket TR4

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-core Socket TR4

AMD
81 Overall Score
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER
65 Overall Score

Scores

Productivity
AMD
92
MICRO CENTER
74
Server
AMD
85
MICRO CENTER
53
Ai Llm
AMD
80
MICRO CENTER
56
Efficiency
AMD
40
MICRO CENTER
64
Gaming
AMD
53
MICRO CENTER
61
Budget
AMD
43
MICRO CENTER
59

Specifications

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WXMICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Processor
BrandAMD—
SeriesRyzen Threadripper PRO—
Model5975WX—
CodenameZen 3—
Classhedt—
Process7★—
Cores & Clocks
Cores32★—
P-cores32★—
Threads64★—
Base Clock
3,600
No data
Boost Clock
4,500
No data
Cache
L2 Cache16★—
L3 Cache
128
No data
Performance
PassMark Multi
75,043
70,110
PassMark Single
3,320
4,737
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4★—
Max Speed
3,200
No data
ECC✓★—
Platform & Power
SocketSocket TR4—
PCIe4.0—
PCIe Lanes
128
No data
TDP280★—
Unlocked✓★—

Pros & Cons

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-core Socket TR4

  • Strong ai (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong feature (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong platform (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

  • Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong ai (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (66th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile

Pricing

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF is ¥159,821 cheaper (1.8x less).

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-core Socket TR4

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

Verdict

★ Winner: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Scores 81 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 23 specs.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Better at:

Ai LlmServerProductivity

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Better at:

BudgetGamingEfficiency

Also Consider