HamiltonBuhl Vivid Pro CAM17SV Red 2020
HamiltonBuhl
20 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm X-T2 X-T2 Black 2016
Fujifilm
67 Overall Score
Scores
Sports Wildlife
Photography
Product Photography
Wedding Events
Beginner
Travel
Streaming
Video
Youtube
Vlogging
Specifications
| HamiltonBuhl Vivid Pro CAM17SV | Fujifilm X-T2 X-T2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | X-Trans CMOS III |
| Size | — | aps-c |
| Megapixels | 18 MP | 24.299999237060547 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Processor | — | X-Processor Pro |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| AF Type | — | Phase Detection: 325 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 8 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 14 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/32000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 1080p | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 30 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | AVI | H.264, H.265 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 2.7" | 3"★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 2.4M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.27 kg★ | 0.31 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
HamiltonBuhl Vivid Pro CAM17SV Red 2020
- Strong stabilization (75th percentile)
- Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average sensor (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
Fujifilm X-T2 X-T2 Black 2016
- Strong sensor (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong evf (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (29th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (34th percentile)
Pricing
HamiltonBuhl Vivid Pro CAM17SV Red 2020
Fujifilm X-T2 X-T2 Black 2016
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm X-T2 X-T2
Scores 67 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 17 of 24 specs.
