Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II Black 2016

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II Black 2016

Olympus
78 Overall Score
vs
iBeam TE-FTGC Black

iBeam TE-FTGC Black

iBeam
19 Overall Score

Scores

Sports Wildlife
Olympus
80
iBeam
17
Beginner
Olympus
77
iBeam
17
Vlogging
Olympus
75
iBeam
8
Streaming
Olympus
75
iBeam
10
Photography
Olympus
74
iBeam
20
Wedding Events
Olympus
73
iBeam
16
Video
Olympus
71
iBeam
16
Product Photography
Olympus
71
iBeam
17
Youtube
Olympus
71
iBeam
12
Travel
Olympus
71
iBeam
10

Specifications

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark IIiBeam TE-FTGC
Sensor
TypeMOSCMOS
Sizemicro-four-thirds—
Megapixels20.299999237060547 MP★—
ISO Range200★—
ProcessorTruePic VIII—
Autofocus
AF Points
121
No data
AF TypeContrast Detection: 121 (121 Cross-Type)Contrast Detection: 121—
Eye AF✓★—
Animal AF✗—
Subject Detection✗—
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)15 fps★—
Burst (Electronic)60 fps★—
Max Shutter1/16000—
Electronic Shutter✓★—
Video
Max Resolution4K★—
4K FPS30 fps★—
1080p FPS120 fps★—
10-bit✗—
Log Profile✗—
RAW Video✗—
CodecH.264—
Display & EVF
Screen Size3"★—
Touchscreen✓★—
Articulating✓★—
EVF Resolution2.4M dots★—
Build
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.50 kg★—
Connectivity
Wi-Fi✓★—
Bluetooth✗—
USBUSB-C 2.0★—
HDMIMicro-HDMI—
Hot Shoe✓★—

Pros & Cons

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II Black 2016

  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong burst (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (88th percentile)88th %ile

iBeam TE-FTGC Black

  • Below average connectivity (21st percentile)
  • Below average video (24th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (29th percentile)
  • Below average display (30th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II

Scores 78 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 19 of 32 specs.

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II E-M1 Mark II Better at:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography