Crucial SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2

Crucial SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2

Crucial
93 Gesamtbewertung
vs
KingSpec P3-FB SATA III

KingSpec P3-FB SATA III

KingSpec
42 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Workstation
Crucial
93
KingSpec
35
Gaming
Crucial
92
KingSpec
27
Console
Crucial
92
KingSpec
14
Budget
Crucial
86
KingSpec
85
Laptop
Crucial
82
KingSpec
40
Portable
Crucial
23
KingSpec
11

Spezifikationen

Crucial SSDKingSpec P3-FB
Drive
Capacity
2,000
512
Form FactorM.22.5"
InterfacePCIe 5.0SATA III
ProtocolNVMeSATA
PCIe Generation5★—
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
12,400
550
Sequential Write (MB/s)
11,800
520
Random Read (IOPS)
1,500,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
1,500,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✓★✗
ControllerPhison E26—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
1,200
Keine Daten
Warranty (years)5★3
Features
Heatsink✓★✗

Vor- & Nachteile

Crucial SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2

  • Strong random (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong speed (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong endurance (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (22nd percentile)

KingSpec P3-FB SATA III

  • Strong affordability (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (68th percentile)
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average speed (34th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (35th percentile)

Preise

KingSpec P3-FB SATA III is 49.448 ¥ cheaper (4.7x less).

Crucial SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.20.001Score pro Dollar
vs
KingSpec P3-FB SATA III0.003Score pro Dollar

KingSpec P3-FB SATA III bietet 3.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Crucial SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2

KingSpec P3-FB SATA III

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Crucial SSD

Scores 93 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 16 specs.

Crucial SSD Besser bei:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen