Crucial T710

Crucial T710

Crucial
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Ediloca EN760

Ediloca EN760

Ediloca
68 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
Crucial
95
Ediloca
53
Budget
Crucial
95
Ediloca
65
Gaming
Crucial
93
Ediloca
65
Workstation
Crucial
88
Ediloca
64
Laptop
Crucial
84
Ediloca
61
Portable
Crucial
26
Ediloca
18

Spezifikationen

Crucial T710Ediloca EN760
Drive
Capacity
4,000
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,500
5,000
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,800
4,500
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,300,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllerMicron—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
2,400
700
MTBF (hours)
1,500,000
Keine Daten
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓✓
Hardware Encryption✗—

Vor- & Nachteile

Crucial T710

  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong endurance (86th percentile)86th %ile

Ediloca EN760

  • Strong endurance (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong feature (79th percentile)
  • Strong speed (72nd percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Crucial T710

Scores 95 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 18 specs.

Crucial T710 Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation