Solidigm D7-PS1010

Solidigm D7-PS1010

Solidigm
83 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Samsung 870 EVO

Samsung 870 EVO

Samsung
62 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Workstation
Solidigm
85
Samsung
61
Budget
Solidigm
37
Samsung
77
Laptop
Solidigm
35
Samsung
59
Gaming
Solidigm
57
Samsung
49
Console
Solidigm
35
Samsung
25
Portable
Solidigm
23
Samsung
17

Spezifikationen

Solidigm D7-PS1010Samsung 870 EVO
Drive
Capacity
7,680
1,000
Form FactorU.22.5"
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4SATA III
ProtocolNVMeSATA
PCIe Generation5★—
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
13,000
560
Sequential Write (MB/s)Keine Daten
530
Random Write (IOPS)Keine Daten
88,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✓✓
Controller—Samsung MKX Controller
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)Keine Daten
600
MTBF (hours)
2,498,352
1,500,000
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✗✗
Hardware Encryption✓✓

Vor- & Nachteile

Solidigm D7-PS1010

  • Strong feature (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong capacity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong speed (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong random (81st percentile)81st %ile

Samsung 870 EVO

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong endurance (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average random (8th percentile)8th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Solidigm D7-PS1010

Scores 83 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 4 of 17 specs.

Solidigm D7-PS1010 Besser bei:

GamingConsolePortableWorkstation

Samsung 870 EVO Besser bei:

BudgetLaptop