SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Lexar NM620 0843367123148 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Lexar NM620 0843367123148 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Lexar
49 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
SanDisk
86
Lexar
19
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Lexar
49
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Lexar
40
Budget
SanDisk
57
Lexar
73
Laptop
SanDisk
66
Lexar
50
Portable
SanDisk
24
Lexar
12

Spezifikationen

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Lexar NM620 0843367123148
Drive
Capacity
8,000
256
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★3
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
3,300
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
3,000
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
Keine Daten
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Keine Daten
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Vor- & Nachteile

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

Lexar NM620 0843367123148 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong affordability (73rd percentile)
  • Strong social proof (68th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Besser bei:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Lexar NM620 0843367123148 Besser bei:

Budget