MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X50

MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X50

MSI
84 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Black 2024

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Black 2024

Gigabyte
88 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
MSI
81
Gigabyte
87
Office
MSI
83
Gigabyte
86
Professional
MSI
83
Gigabyte
83
Creative
MSI
82
Gigabyte
81
Entertainment
MSI
72
Gigabyte
80
Portable
MSI
20
Gigabyte
15

Spezifikationen

MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X50Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32"
Display
Size27"32"
Resolution2560 x 14403840 x 2160
Panel TypeQD-OLEDOLED
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Performance
Refresh Rate500 Hz240 Hz
Response Time0.029999999329447746 ms0.029999999329447746 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium ProFreeSync Premium Pro
Color & HDR
Brightness300 nits250 nits
Color Gamut98% Adobe RGB, 99% DCI-P3, 138% sRGB99% DCI-P3
Color Depth10-bit10bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 500DisplayHDR True Black 400
HDR SupportHDRHDR
Connectivity
HDMI Ports22
DisplayPort11
USB-C11
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Weight4.75 kg8.53 kg

Vor- & Nachteile

MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X50

  • Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong color (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Black 2024

  • Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32"

Scores 88 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 27 specs.

MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X50 Besser bei:

Portable

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Besser bei:

GamingOfficeEntertainment