Samsung QHC QH65C 65"

Samsung QHC QH65C 65"

Samsung
60 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Philips 346B1C

Philips 346B1C

Philips
65 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Samsung
75
Philips
59
Office
Samsung
69
Philips
75
Creative
Samsung
75
Philips
56
Entertainment
Samsung
46
Philips
59
Gaming
Samsung
43
Philips
58
Portable
Samsung
8
Philips
12

Spezifikationen

Samsung QHC QH65C 65"Philips 346B1C
Display
Size65"34"
Resolution3840 x 21603440 x 1440
Panel TypeVAVA
Aspect Ratio16:921:9
Curved
Curvature1,500
Performance
Refresh Rate60 Hz100 Hz
Response Time8 ms5 ms
Adaptive SyncAdaptive-Sync
Color & HDR
Brightness700 nits300 nits
Color Gamut72% NTSC119% sRGB, 100% NTSC, 90% Adobe RGB
Color Depth10-bit
Connectivity
HDMI Ports31
DisplayPort11
USB-C1
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount400x300100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Power204W34W
Weight22.40 kg15.29 kg

Vor- & Nachteile

Samsung QHC QH65C 65"

  • Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong display (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong connectivity (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average performance (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average portability (24th percentile)
  • Below average feature (25th percentile)

Philips 346B1C

  • Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong display (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong connectivity (78th percentile)
  • Strong portability (75th percentile)

Preise

Philips 346B1C is 359.679 ¥ cheaper (3.3x less).

Samsung QHC QH65C 65"

Fazit

Gewinner: Philips 346B1C

Scores 65 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 6 of 27 specs.

Samsung QHC QH65C 65" Besser bei:

CreativeProfessional

Philips 346B1C Besser bei:

GamingOfficePortableEntertainment

Auch in Betracht ziehen