Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR

Nikon
38 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma 36B965

Sigma 36B965

Sigma
35 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Portrait
Nikon
56
Sigma
60
Budget
Nikon
49
Sigma
40
Video Cinema
Nikon
42
Sigma
36
Street
Nikon
41
Sigma
41
Professional
Nikon
34
Sigma
30
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
31
Sigma
27
Travel
Nikon
29
Sigma
15
Landscape
Nikon
24
Sigma
14
Macro
Nikon
13
Sigma
16

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VRSigma 36B965
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min24 mm45 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm45 mm
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony E
Weight1.99 kg4.13 kg
Filter Thread55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR

  • Strong versatility (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average build (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)

Sigma 36B965

  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Preise

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gleichstand

Both products are closely matched - Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR wins 2 specs while Sigma 36B965 wins 1.

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR Besser bei:

BudgetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sigma 36B965 Besser bei:

MacroPortrait

Auch in Betracht ziehen