Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Viltrox EVO AF 55/1.8 Z 55mm

Viltrox EVO AF 55/1.8 Z 55mm

Viltrox
31 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Landscape
Sigma
91
Viltrox
28
Budget
Sigma
91
Viltrox
26
Portrait
Sigma
87
Viltrox
42
Macro
Sigma
86
Viltrox
48
Professional
Sigma
82
Viltrox
35
Video Cinema
Sigma
80
Viltrox
34
Travel
Sigma
80
Viltrox
17
Street
Sigma
77
Viltrox
36
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
77
Viltrox
28

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OSViltrox EVO AF 55/1.8 Z 55mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm55 mm
Elements2013
Groups149
Aspherical Elements4★1
ED Elements5★2
Coatingwater and oil repellent coatingHD Nano Multicoating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture3.5-6.7f/1.8
Constant✗—
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.61 kg★0.90 kg
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHLAAutofocus
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops6 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm★430 mm
Max Magnification1:2★—

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile

Viltrox EVO AF 55/1.8 Z 55mm

  • Strong optical (74th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average build (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Preise

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS

Viltrox EVO AF 55/1.8 Z 55mm

No current pricing available

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen